Today (Wednesday) is Day 2 of Mark Zuckerberg's testimony. Yesterday he was well rehearsed but so many things appeared as diversions and BS. Will it really take 5-10 years to institute privacy safeguards? Can the simulation last that long? Was Facebook and other social media tools created to monitor and control humans? Need I ask? What about government spying on citizens? This will never get better - from Utopia to Dystopia none of this feels real. As I listen to people who follow the world of politics - steeped in drama and conspiracies - more and more I hear words like "Cabal" "Secret Governments" things only mentioned in secret briefings in the past. Ah yes ... it is all coming around. Hang in and follow the dramas as your time and interest allows. Always remember to follow the money ...
Mark Zuckerberg testimony: Key moments from Facebook CEO's day in the hot seat NBC - April 11, 2018
Is Facebook a Monopoly? Robert Mueller's team has interviewed some Facebook employees ...
This is how Facebook uses your data for ad targeting Recode - April 11, 2018
Senate fails its Zuckerberg test - Zuckerberg testimony in two minutes CNN - April 11, 2018
Zuckerberg shoots down conspiracy theory that Facebook taps your microphone Verge - April 10, 2018
Fragmented U.S. Privacy Rules Leave Large Data Loopholes for Facebook and Others Scientific American - April 10, 2018
Zuckerberg: Facebook is in arms race with Russia BBC - April 10, 2018
Mark Zuckerberg tells Congress Facebook is 'working with' Mueller's investigators as lawmakers demand answers on how Cambridge Analytica got access to 87 million users' data - then says Daily Mail - April 10, 2018
Michael Cohen: Why the raid on Trump's lawyer is a big deal BBC - April 11, 2018
Bipartisan group of senators moving to protect Mueller's job CBS - April 11, 2018
Can Trump fire special counsel Mueller? Maybe, but the probe would go on NBC - April 11, 2018
Trump's perceived persecution fuels unrest in Washington CNN - April 11, 2018
If he sacks Rosenstein and Mueller, the ability to hold a strongman president in check is called into question